Green Bay Packers vs Bengals Match Player Stats – Box Score & Top Leaders

The Green Bay Packers secured a 27-18 victory over the Cincinnati Bengals on October 12, 2025, during Week 6 of the NFL season, with quarterback Jordan Love outdueling veteran Joe Flacco in a statistically revealing matchup at Lambeau Field. While Cincinnati entered the contest seeking to reverse a 2-4 start to their campaign, Green Bay’s balanced offensive attack and time-consuming drives proved decisive in the nine-point win.

Player statistics from this interconference game reveal stark contrasts in offensive philosophy. The Packers generated 409 total yards while controlling possession for nearly 33 minutes, whereas the Bengals relied heavily on Flacco’s arm, resulting in 45 pass attempts but only 268 total yards. Anytime Fitness Membership Price – Monthly Rates and Location Variations data suggests athletic performance metrics continue evolving across professional sports.

Individual performances varied significantly across both rosters. Running back Josh Jacobs spearheaded Green Bay’s ground assault with 93 yards and two touchdowns, while Cincinnati’s Ja’Marr Chase served as Flacco’s primary target, hauling in 10 receptions. The official box score, documented by CBS Sports and ESPN, confirms these figures represent the complete statistical record from this October contest.

What were the key player stats in the Packers vs Bengals game?

Seven statistical disparities defined this contest:

1. Ground dominance: Josh Jacobs accumulated 93 rushing yards on 18 carries, scoring twice.
2. Passing efficiency: Jordan Love achieved a 101.3 passer rating, completing 73% of his attempts.
3. Volume vs. production: Joe Flacco threw 19 more passes than Love but accumulated 40 fewer yards.
4. Target share: Ja’Marr Chase absorbed 12 targets, converting them into 10 receptions.
5. Clock control: Green Bay held possession for over five minutes longer than Cincinnati.
6. Yards per play: The Packers averaged significantly more yards per rush (4.6) compared to the Bengals (3.4).
7. Clean sheet: Cincinnati committed zero turnovers despite the loss.

Who were the top performers for passing, rushing, and receiving?

Passing Leaders

Jordan Love operated with precision, connecting on 19 of 26 passes for 259 yards and one touchdown against one interception. His 7.4 yards per attempt significantly outpaced Cincinnati’s aerial output. Joe Flacco, handling duties for the Bengals, completed 29 of 45 attempts for 219 yards, finding the end zone twice while avoiding turnovers. ESPN’s box score documents these figures as official.

Rushing Leaders

Josh Jacobs provided the offensive backbone for Green Bay, carrying 18 times for 93 yards and punching in two scores. The Packers’ committee approach generated 153 total rushing yards on 33 attempts. Cincinnati managed only 55 yards on the ground across 16 carries, averaging a modest 3.4 yards per attempt.

Receiving Leaders

Ja’Marr Chase served as Flacco’s security blanket, catching 10 of 12 targeted passes for 94 yards and a touchdown. Tee Higgins contributed 5 receptions for 62 yards. For Green Bay, rookie Matthew Golden paced the unit with 3 catches for 86 yards, while Aaron Jones added 4 receptions for 27 yards out of the backfield.

What were the defensive and special teams stats?

Takeaway Battle

The Packers defense forced no turnovers, while Love’s lone interception represented the game’s only giveaway. Cincinnati protected the football effectively despite the scoring disadvantage.

Pass Rush and Coverage

Specific sack totals and individual defensive statistics remain unreported in available official summaries. Comprehensive team statistics pages on CBS Sports and ESPN track additional defensive metrics.

Special Teams

Detailed kicking statistics, including field goals and punting averages, were not available in the official box score. The final score suggests successful execution by both placekickers, though specific distances and attempts remain undocumented.

How did the quarterbacks perform: Jordan Love vs Joe Flacco?

Jordan Love and Joe Flacco presented contrasting styles under center. Love emphasized efficiency, distributing 26 attempts across multiple targets while maintaining a 101.3 passer rating. Flacco operated as a volume passer, attempting 45 throws to accumulate his 219 yards, resulting in a 90.9 rating.

Accuracy favored Love, who completed 73% of his passes compared to Flacco’s 64%. However, Flacco demonstrated superior red-zone touchdown production, tossing two scoring strikes against Love’s one. The veteran’s willingness to challenge coverage repeatedly benefited Chase and Higgins, though the offense stalled elsewhere.

How did the game progress statistically?

The contest unfolded through distinct phases of offensive control. While exact quarter-by-quarter scoring distributions remain unavailable in current reports, key statistical milestones marked the game’s progression.

1. Green Bay established early dominance in time of possession, ultimately controlling the ball for 32 minutes and 44 seconds.
2. Josh Jacobs surpassed the 90-yard rushing threshold by game’s end, finishing with 93 yards on 18 carries.
3. Joe Flacco attempted 45 passes, completing 29, as Cincinnati abandoned the running game.
4. Jordan Love reached 259 passing yards on just 26 attempts, maximizing each throw.
5. Ja’Marr Chase secured his 10th reception late in the contest, cementing his status as the game’s leading receiver.
6. The Bengals entered the fourth quarter trailing, unable to narrow the deficit beyond the final 27-18 margin.

What statistics are confirmed and what remains uncertain?

What do these statistics indicate for both franchises?

Green Bay’s statistical profile suggests a sustainable offensive model. The nearly even split between passing and rushing production, combined with dominant time of possession, indicates a mature approach capable of supporting deep playoff runs. Love’s efficiency metrics demonstrate continued development as a franchise signal-caller.

Cincinnati’s numbers raise concerns about offensive predictability. The 45 pass attempts against only 16 rushes reveal a one-dimensional attack that Green Bay’s defense exploited. With the team falling to 2-4, the statistical imbalance between Flacco’s volume and actual point production highlights systemic issues requiring correction. Modern Family Cast – Actors, Characters and Families analysis techniques mirror how statistical ensemble approaches can reveal formation dynamics.

The absence of Joe Burrow fundamentally altered Cincinnati’s statistical ceiling. Flacco’s competent but limited performance, characterized by a sub-100 passer rating despite high volume, illustrates the difficulty of maintaining offensive identity with backup quarterbacks facing established defenses.

Where do these official player statistics originate?

Player statistics derive from official National Football League game logs and verified box scores maintained by CBS Sports and ESPN. These sources compile real-time data from Lambeau Field officials and NFL statistical services.

“The Packers defeated the Bengals 27-18, with Jordan Love completing 19 of 26 passes for 259 yards and one touchdown. Josh Jacobs led all rushers with 93 yards and two scores on 18 carries.”

— Official Box Score, CBS Sports

Additional verification is available through NFL.com and Pro-Football-Reference, which aggregate these figures into historical databases. Football Outsiders provides advanced analytical context for these traditional statistics.

What is the key takeaway from this matchup?

The statistical profile of this matchup demonstrates Green Bay’s superior roster balance and execution, with Jordan Love and Josh Jacobs delivering complementary performances that controlled clock and field position. Cincinnati’s dependence on Joe Flacco’s high-volume passing—necessitated by Joe Burrow’s absence and an ineffective ground game—proved insufficient against a disciplined Packers defense, leaving the Bengals at 2-4 while Green Bay advanced their standing through methodical, statistically dominant football.

Frequently Asked Questions